Center for American Unity Press Release on Hamdi Case

June 28, 2004

Hamdi v.                          Rumsfeld decision released                          today

YASER HAMDI CALLED A "PRESUMED                          AMERICAN CITIZEN" BY JUSTICES SCALIA AND STEVENS

WASHINGTON, D.C.                          — As the Supreme Court released its opinion in the                          controversial case of Hamdi v. Rumsfeld today, the Center for                          American Unity called it "small step forward and a                          missed opportunity."

The Hamdi v.                          Rumsfeld case is centered around a Saudi Arabian man                          who was captured on a battlefield in Afghanistan. He is                          claiming all rights of citizenship because his Saudi                          parents lived here briefly when he was born.

"Today                          Justices Stevens and Scalia – generally on                         opposite ideological poles – used the term                           'presumed American citizen' to describe Yaser Hamdi, who                          has sued the government for holding him in a Navy brig                          for two years," said Peter                          Brimelow, President of the Center for American Unity. "Hamdi claims to be a U.S. citizen, but as the Center                          for American Unity demonstrated in a                         friend of the court brief, Hamdi should not be                          recognized as a citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment's                          'Birthright Citizenship Clause.'"

Peter Brimelow's                          Center for American Unity filed a friend of the court                          brief explaining that "drive-by citizenship" or "birthright                          citizenship" is not the                          original intention of the                          framers of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth                          Amendment requires that a "birthright" citizen be                          subject to the jurisdiction of the United States which                          means having an allegiance to this country.

"Our brief in                          the Hamdi case explained to the Court how                          unconstitutional and unreasonable the automatic                          citizenship rule is and how that rule damages the United                          States," Brimelow continued. "While the Court did not                          choose to define the terms of citizenship in the opinion                          released today, which is a missed opportunity, they used                          the term "presumed American citizen," which shows that                          the Justices are aware of the issue."

"We will                          continue to raise this issue at every opportunity - - it                          is of                         vital importance to the future of the United States.

"United                          States citizenship requires more than the accident of                          being born on U.S. soil - - an allegiance to the United                          States is necessary," Brimelow said. "The  European Union countries — and                          Mexico — do not automatically grant citizenship to                          babies of tourists or those with temporary visas.

"The  Court's                          opinion comes at a time when the one European country                          permitting 'birthright' citizenship ended it. Earlier                          this month Irish voters overwhelmingly approved a plan                          to do away with birthright citizenship in that country," Brimelow said.[ The amicus brief can be read at                         www.cfau.org.]